Ro Khanna and Anna Paulina Luna agree on almost nothing. He is a progressive Democrat from California who has spent years pushing economic populism from the left. She is a MAGA-aligned Republican from Florida known for confrontational floor speeches and hardline immigration positions. On July 28, the two representatives stood together anyway to introduce a bill neither party has managed to pass on its own: a ban on federal elected officials using campaign donations to fight or settle claims of sexual assault, abuse, or harassment brought against them.

What the bill would actually change

The legislation would prohibit members of Congress, other federal elected officials, and candidates for federal office from tapping campaign funds or legal-defense funds to cover legal fees tied specifically to sexual misconduct allegations. Under current law, lawmakers accused of harassment or abuse can, and repeatedly have, drawn on money donated for their campaigns to hire lawyers, settle claims, or otherwise manage the legal fallout from those allegations, effectively asking supporters who gave money for policy goals to underwrite a personal legal defense instead.

Khanna framed the underlying problem in terms of accountability rather than partisanship. "That creates this culture of impunity where people think they're untouchable," he said, describing how insulation from personal financial consequences can embolden the exact behavior the bill targets. Luna made a similar argument from a different angle, calling the current arrangement a distortion of how the campaign finance system was ever supposed to function. "It is not what the Founding Fathers intended for members of Congress," she said, adding bluntly that the practice amounts to "a perversion of the system."

The scandals that pushed this bill forward

The legislation did not emerge from an abstract policy debate. It follows what multiple outlets have described as a spate of sexual misconduct scandals involving members of Congress from both parties earlier this year, incidents serious enough that they already prompted the formation of a bipartisan working group tasked with revising the policies that protect Capitol Hill staffers from harassment. That earlier working group effort focused on internal Hill workplace protections; the Khanna-Luna bill goes further by targeting the financial mechanism lawmakers have used to manage the consequences once an allegation becomes public.

Republican Representative Tony Gonzales of Texas has faced recent reporting scrutiny over past conduct, and Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell has drawn separate criticism over how campaign resources were used in response to accusations against him, though the specifics and current status of each matter differ. The through-line connecting these separate controversies is the pattern the bill targets directly: campaign money, raised for political purposes, being redirected toward managing personal legal exposure tied to misconduct claims.

A genuinely bipartisan pairing, not just a press release

Khanna and Luna's partnership on this specific bill is notable less for its policy substance, which has bipartisan appeal in the abstract, and more for who is actually putting their names on it together. The two representatives have publicly clashed on nearly every major partisan flashpoint of the current Congress, from Israel policy to defense authorization votes to immigration enforcement. Their joint appearance on this legislation signals that at least some version of campaign-finance accountability around sexual misconduct claims has crossed the aisle in a way that few other current proposals have managed.

Cheyenne Hunt, credited by Khanna's office for her work and leadership on the issue, has been involved in shaping the bill's substance, according to Khanna's public statement announcing the legislation.

Why this bill faces long odds despite the bipartisan pairing

Bipartisan sponsorship from two ideologically distant members does not guarantee floor time or a vote, and Congress has a long recent history of campaign-finance and ethics reform proposals that generate strong initial press coverage before stalling in committee. Luna herself has direct experience with this pattern: she successfully used a discharge petition earlier this year to force a floor vote on an unrelated proxy-voting measure for new parents in Congress, a maneuver that requires 218 signatures and rarely succeeds, precisely because leadership in both parties tends to resist legislation that creates uncomfortable votes for their own members.

Whether the Khanna-Luna bill follows a similar path toward a forced vote, or quietly stalls the way many single-issue ethics bills have before it, will likely depend on how much sustained public attention the underlying scandals continue to receive heading into the 2026 midterms. Ethics-focused legislation has tended to gain the most traction in Congress precisely when it follows closely on the heels of a specific, well-publicized incident, and largely loses momentum once press attention moves elsewhere.

The broader accountability moment this bill is part of

This legislation lands alongside a separate but related push already underway in the House: the recently passed Stop Insider Trading Act, which similarly aimed at closing a gap between what the public expects of elected officials and what current law technically permits. Taken together, these efforts suggest a broader, if still uneven, appetite within Congress for closing loopholes that let members of Congress use the tools and resources of public office, whether campaign donations or trading access, in ways ordinary constitutional norms were never designed to allow.

For survivors of harassment or abuse involving a member of Congress, the practical stakes of this specific bill are straightforward: it would remove one financial advantage currently available to an accused lawmaker that is not available to virtually anyone else facing similar allegations, a gap that has shaped how several recent scandals played out in practice, regardless of which party the accused member belonged to.

---

*Sources cited in this article include reporting from The Washington Post, Townhall, and Political Wire covering the bill's introduction on July 28, 2026, along with public statements from Representatives Ro Khanna and Anna Paulina Luna. This article presents statements from both bill sponsors; all figures reflect reporting available as of July 29, 2026.*